Skip to content

Maidstone Council decides against development at Junction 8

Elementary Admin
By Elementary Admin &
20th July 2015

Maidstone Borough Council has voted overwhelmingly to remove a proposal to develop Junction 8 of the M20 that was included in its Draft Economic Development Strategy 2015-2031. This reversed a decision of the Policy and Resources Committee and followed pressure from CPRE Kent, parish councils, Leeds Castle and thousands of residents.

However the strategy does still include a paragraph stating “the strategic case for a new employment site has been established…” so the victory may only be partial and temporary.

Photo by Stephen Sutherland
Photo by Stephen Sutherland

We are still awaiting the decision of the planning inspector into plans Waterside park, a warehouse and industrial development at the site.

Maidstone_Borough_Council_logo

Madestone Borough Council spent tens of thousands of pounds opposing this development at the recent public inquiry. the plans were also opposed by Kent County Council, Natural England and Kent Police for many reasons including harm to the setting of the Area of Outstanding natural beauty, harm to the important heritage setting of Leeds Castle, fears of contamination of water supplies, lack of sustainability, particularly inadequate public transport.

July 20th 2015

  • A number of important documents have yet to emerge. For example, a rigorous transport plan and a finalised air-quality assessment. The latter is critical given that allocations at Teynham will feed extra traffic into AQMAs.
  • There seems to be no coherent plan for infrastructure delivery – a key component of the plan given the allocations being proposed near the already crowded Junction 7.
  • There seems to have been little or no cooperation with neighbouring boroughs or even parish councils within Swale itself.

The removal of a second consultation might have been understandable if this final version of the plan were similar to that being talked about at the beginning of the consultation process. It is, however, radically different in the following ways:

  • There has been a major shift in the balance of housing allocations, away from the west of the borough over to the east, especially around the historic town of Faversham. This is a move that raises many concerns.
  • A new large allocation, with accompanying A2 bypass, has appeared around Teynham and Lynsted, to which we are objecting.
  • Housing allocations in the AONB around Neames Forstal that were judged “unsuitable” by the council’s own officers have now appeared as part of the housing numbers.
  • Most of the housing allocations being proposed are on greenfield sites, many of them on Grade 1 agricultural land – a point to which we are strongly objecting.

Concerns about the rush to submit the plan

The haste with which the plan is being prepared is especially worrying given the concentration of housing in Faversham. If the town is to take a large amount of new housing, it is imperative that the policies concerning the area are carefully worked out to preserve, as far as possible, the unique nature of the town. The rush to submit the plan is likely to prove detrimental.

As Swale does not have a five-year land housing supply, it is open to speculative development proposals, many of which would run counter to the ideas contained in the current plan. Some are already appearing. This is a common situation, and one that, doubtless, is a reason behind Swale’s haste.

Our overriding fear, however, is that this emphasis on haste is ultimately going to prove counterproductive. This is because it is our view that the plan, in its current form, is unlikely to pass independent examination. We are urging Swale to listen to and act upon the comments being made about the plan and to return the plan to the council with appropriate modifications before submitting it to the Secretary of State.

Essentially, this means treating the current consultation not as the final one but as the ‘lost’ second consultation.

The consultation ends on Friday 30 April and we strongly urge residents to make their opinions known if they have not already done so.

Further information