Benenden Blue: it's not a cheese, so what is it?
A shade over a week ago, we asked for photographs of Kent that showed our county in its glory. The brief for Kent, Our Kent was wide-ranging (see here) and included anything from images of places we’re looking forward to seeing again to shots taken on our daily exercise walks.
We have had an encouraging response, so thanks to all of you who have got back to us with pictures. We share the first of them here and there are many more to follow. Hopefully, you will be encouraged to send in your own contributions.
Today’s shots come from our Tunbridge Wells chair, Liz Akenhead. She describes the first: “The Benenden Blue rosemary on my terrace has been flowering for weeks and it’s constantly buzzing with various sorts of bee and hoverfly.
“It’s a wonderful decorative plant named after a beautiful Kent village, and it’s good to cook with, too.”
The second captures (in the nicest possible way) a striking-looking mammal. “It’s one of the three white squirrels we sometimes see in our garden,” said Liz.
Thanks to Liz. Everyone else, get snapping!
In the meantime, take care and stay safe…
- If you like to contribute to Kent, Our Kent, please send your photos and a brief description to david.mairs@cprekent.org.uk
Tuesday, April 28, 2020
- A number of important documents have yet to emerge. For example, a rigorous transport plan and a finalised air-quality assessment. The latter is critical given that allocations at Teynham will feed extra traffic into AQMAs.
- There seems to be no coherent plan for infrastructure delivery – a key component of the plan given the allocations being proposed near the already crowded Junction 7.
- There seems to have been little or no cooperation with neighbouring boroughs or even parish councils within Swale itself.
The removal of a second consultation might have been understandable if this final version of the plan were similar to that being talked about at the beginning of the consultation process. It is, however, radically different in the following ways:
- There has been a major shift in the balance of housing allocations, away from the west of the borough over to the east, especially around the historic town of Faversham. This is a move that raises many concerns.
- A new large allocation, with accompanying A2 bypass, has appeared around Teynham and Lynsted, to which we are objecting.
- Housing allocations in the AONB around Neames Forstal that were judged “unsuitable” by the council’s own officers have now appeared as part of the housing numbers.
- Most of the housing allocations being proposed are on greenfield sites, many of them on Grade 1 agricultural land – a point to which we are strongly objecting.
Concerns about the rush to submit the plan
The haste with which the plan is being prepared is especially worrying given the concentration of housing in Faversham. If the town is to take a large amount of new housing, it is imperative that the policies concerning the area are carefully worked out to preserve, as far as possible, the unique nature of the town. The rush to submit the plan is likely to prove detrimental.
As Swale does not have a five-year land housing supply, it is open to speculative development proposals, many of which would run counter to the ideas contained in the current plan. Some are already appearing. This is a common situation, and one that, doubtless, is a reason behind Swale’s haste.
Our overriding fear, however, is that this emphasis on haste is ultimately going to prove counterproductive. This is because it is our view that the plan, in its current form, is unlikely to pass independent examination. We are urging Swale to listen to and act upon the comments being made about the plan and to return the plan to the council with appropriate modifications before submitting it to the Secretary of State.
Essentially, this means treating the current consultation not as the final one but as the ‘lost’ second consultation.
The consultation ends on Friday 30 April and we strongly urge residents to make their opinions known if they have not already done so.
Further information